MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2048796846 · doi:10.1139/f02-134

Seasonal enrichment and depletion of Hg and SO<sub>4</sub> in Little Rock Lake: relationship to seasonal changes in atmospheric deposition

2002· article· en· W2048796846 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Carl J. Watras, K. A. Morrison, T. K. Kratz

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMercury impact and mitigation studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersWisconsin Department of Natural Resources
KeywordsDeposition (geology)Environmental sciencePrecipitationNorthern HemispherePollutantTroposphereAnnual cycleResidence time (fluid dynamics)Atmospheric sciencesWater cycleHydrology (agriculture)ClimatologyGeologyStructural basinEcologyMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hg and SO4 are priority pollutants in fresh waters throughout the northern hemisphere; both have atmospheric sources associated with anthropogenic emissions to the lower troposphere. Although depositional change has had a demonstrable impact on lakes over decadal time scales, effects over shorter time scales remain uncertain. To better understand the responsiveness of lakes to changing pollutant inputs, we examined the coupling of water chemistry to atmospheric deposition over time scales of weeks to years in Little Rock Lake. The results indicate that the lake is tightly coupled to its air shed with respect to Hg. The annual cycle of Hg in surface waters closely tracks the annual cycle of Hg in precipitation. For SO4, the annual cycle in lake water is damped and not in phase with the cycle of atmospheric deposition because of more intense internal recycling. These observations are in keeping with the residence times of Hg and S in lake water (Hg in months; S in years). Nevertheless, because atmospheric deposition is the dominant source of both pollutants, trends in lake water track trends in precipitation over a decadal time scale. Thus, remote lakes may be highly responsive to short term changes in Hg deposition, whereas responses to SO4 deposition may be more gradual.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.088

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences→Same topicMercury impact and mitigation studies→French-language works237,207→