MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048829216 · doi:10.1159/000338692

Absence of Community-Acquired Methicillin-Resistant <b><i>Staphylococcus aureus</i></b> Carriage or Infection in a Cohort of 300 Men Who Have Sex with Men Attending an Inner-City Sexually Transmitted Disease Clinic in Paris, France

2012· article· en· W2048829216 on OpenAlexaff
S. Fouéré, Pierre-Luc Dion, I Casin, Myriem Zouakh-Agsous, Philippe Bonhomme, Pascal Del-Giudice, Michel Janier, O. Chosidow

Bibliographic record

VenueDermatology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
Canadian institutionsCégep de Lévis
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarriageMedicineStaphylococcus aureusProspective cohort studyInternal medicineBiologyPathologyBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (caMRSA) skin and soft-tissue infections are a major cause for concern. Communities of men who have sex with men (MSM) in the USA being prone to caMRSA epidemics, we investigated whether MSM attending our sexually transmitted disease clinic were carriers of or infected by caMRSA. METHODS: 300 MSM were prospectively recruited, interrogated and examined. Swabs of their nares and of their pubic and perineal skin were taken and cultured. RESULTS: No evidence of carriage or infection by caMRSA was found. Nasal carriage of methicillin-sensitive S. aureus was within French estimates. Perineal carriage significantly correlated with the number of sexual partners. CONCLUSION: Although caMRSA carriage or infection does not seem to affect Paris MSM, prospective sampling may not be the best method to monitor them. The correlation between number of partners and perineal carriage suggests that thorough hygiene after intercourse could limit the spread of S. aureus in MSM with multiple partners.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.303
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDermatologySame topicAntimicrobial Resistance in StaphylococcusFrench-language works237,207