MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048835635 · doi:10.1002/dvdy.10310

Isolation of a novel cDNA enriched in the undifferentiated chick retina and lens

2003· article· en· W2048835635 on OpenAlexaff
Roseline Godbout, Randy Andison, Sachin Katyal, Dwayne A. Bisgrove

Bibliographic record

VenueDevelopmental Dynamics · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicConnexins and lens biology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyRetinaIn situ hybridizationLens (geology)Eye developmentMolecular biologyComplementary DNARetinalCell biologyMessenger RNAGeneGeneticsPhenotypeBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

By using a differential screening strategy, we have identified a previously uncharacterised gene that is preferentially expressed in chick retinal precursor cells as well as in the anterior epithelial cells of the lens at early stages of development. The EURL transcript has an open reading frame of 293 amino acids and a 3' untranslated region of >850 nucleotides. The only recognizable feature in the EURL (early undifferentiated retina and lens) amino acid sequence is a putative coiled-coil domain located at the C-terminus of the protein. The human EURL orthologue maps to chromosome 21q21. Northern blot analysis, in situ hybridization of tissue sections, and whole-mount hybridization indicate elevated levels of EURL mRNA in the embryonic dorsal retina from stage 14 (day 2) to stage 18 (day 3). At day 3.5, when >90% of the retinal cells are in the proliferative stage, EURL transcripts are found primarily in the peripheral dorsal retina, i.e., the most undifferentiated part of the dorsal retina. EURL transcripts are also detected in the lens at stage 18 and remain abundant in the proliferating epithelial cells of the lens until at least day 11. The distribution pattern of EURL in the developing retina and lens suggest a role before the events leading to cell determination and differentiation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.763
Threshold uncertainty score0.267

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDevelopmental DynamicsSame topicConnexins and lens biologyFrench-language works237,207