MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048904286 · doi:10.1063/1.4794655

Calorimetric investigation of structural relaxation of bulk metallic glasses

2013· article· en· W2048904286 on OpenAlexafffund
Daisman P. B. Aji, Ping Wen, G. P. Johari

Bibliographic record

VenueAIP conference proceedings · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMaterial Dynamics and Properties
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaChinese Academy of Sciences
KeywordsEnthalpyThermodynamicsMaterials scienceAnnealing (glass)Relaxation (psychology)Glass transitionEntropy (arrow of time)Amorphous metalMetallurgyPhysicsPolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Enthalpy and entropy changes on structural relaxation of Mg65Cu25Tb10 glass have been studied after keeping its samples for varying periods of time ta at several temperatures Tas, and after keeping for fixed ta at various Tas. At a fixed Ta, the decrease in the enthalpy and entropy occurred with time according to a non-exponential kinetics. When the sample was kept for the same ta, but at different Tas, the decrease in the enthalpy and entropy showed a peak at a temperature when the sample reached an equilibrium state for that ta. The rate of heat release from the DSC heating scan was analyzed in terms of the model for non-exponential, non-linear enthalpy relaxation. A single set of parameters that fitted the data for un-annealed glass did not fit the data for the highly annealed glass. This is expected in view of the approximations made in the model and the contribution from the Johari-Goldstein (JG) relaxation. It is shown that the distribution of relaxation times leads to memory effect for a glass sample of complex thermal history. This has been investigated by measurement of the enthalpy change on structural relaxation of two bulk metallic glasses, Mg65Cu25Tb10 and Zr46.75Ti8.25Cu7.5Ni10Be27.5 by DSC using two-step annealing temperature procedure. The memory effect was observed as an increase in enthalpy with time and then a decrease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.085
Threshold uncertainty score0.823

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIP conference proceedingsSame topicMaterial Dynamics and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207