Relationship between quality of life and disease severity in atopic dermatitis/eczema syndrome during childhood
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Atopic dermatitis is a chronic relapsing itchy disease that has an effect on children and families' quality of life. The purpose of this review is to give workers in the field an easy-to-read, up-to-date and accessible summary of recent advances in the relationship between quality of life and disease severity in atopic dermatitis/eczema syndrome during childhood. This review, however, concentrates on original articles that have been published since 1 April 2002, and reports a relationship between disease severity and quality of life scores in childhood atopic dermatitis. RECENT FINDINGS: It has been shown that childhood atopic dermatitis has a major impact on children and families' quality of life. Researchers also reported that scores on quality of life and disease severity were positively correlated at a point in time and over a period of time. They also showed that children and quality of life measures have improved after medical interference. SUMMARY: Despite the limitation of the studies reviewed, it is logical to conclude that childhood atopic dermatitis has affected children and families' quality of life. These studies have also reported that disease severity and quality of life are correlated in childhood atopic dermatitis at a point in time and over time. However, these aspects should be studied further in order to evaluate the long-term impact of the disease and its variation during childhood. Disease severity and quality of life should be measured independently.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".