Cadmium-Induced Mitochondrial Membrane-Potential Dissipation Does Not Necessarily Require Cytosolic Oxidative Stress: Studies Using Rhodamine-123 Fluorescence Unquenching
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The impact of cadmium on the cellular redox state and mitochondrial membrane potential (psi(m)) has been studied by monitoring dichlorofluorescein (DCF), CMXRos (dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate, chloromethyl-X-rosamine), and Rh-123 fluorescence in 5-day-old TC7 cells, a highly differentiated clone of the human intestinal Caco-2 cell line. Flow cytometry analyses, using DCFH oxidation to DCF, clearly revealed that a 30-min incubation to 50 microM cadmium (Cd) is sufficient to induce reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation; this effect was completely eliminated by the presence of 50 mM mannitol for the 30-min incubation period, but mannitol only partially scavenged ROS for the longer period of time studied. Imaging studies using fluorescence video microscopy revealed a parallel increase in (DCF) fluorescence in the nuclear and cytoplasmic regions as soon as Cd was added to the exposure medium. Flow cytometry analyses monitoring CMXRos fluorescence clearly showed that Cd also leads to psi(m) disruption, but, contrary to what was observed for ROS formation, mannitol was completely inefficient in preventing this effect. Further investigation using fluorescence microscopy and Rh-123 fluorescence unquenching revealed that although mannitol did not protect against Cd-induced dissipation of psi(m), it considerably delayed the process. We found that Rh-123 unquenching, occurring during probe redistribution, is a suitable tool to monitor the decrease of psi(m). We conclude that Cd rapidly induces ROS formation, mainly hydroxyl radical species OH(*), as well as the loss of psi(m). However, psi(m) dissipation does not necessarily require cellular OH(*) and may occur in the absence of apparent oxidative injury.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".