Occurrences of Natural Gas Hydrates beneath the Permafrost Zone in Mackenzie Delta: Visual and X‐ray CT Imagery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: The JAPEX/JNOC/GSC Mallik 2L‐38 research well was drilled to a depth of 1,150 m beneath the permafrost zone in the Mackenzie Delta, N.W.T., Canada, early in 1998. A large amount of natural gas hydrates were successfully retrieved from a variety of sandy and gravel sediments. Over 110 m of gas hydrate‐bearing sediments were found to be distributed between 897 m and 1,100 m deep. Approximately 37 meters of core were recovered in this interval with most of the recovered gas hydrates being less than 2 mm in size occurring mainly in intergranular porosity of silty to clean massive sand and conglomerate (granule to pebble). Typically, hydrate‐bearing strata were between 10 cm and more than one meter thick with an estimated porosity of 25 to 35%. The largest form of hydrate was about 2 cm in diameter, occurring as clasts and intergranular porosity within granular sands. Occurrences of natural gas hydrate have been observed visually at the drill site and in core samples preserved in pressurized storage vessels utilizing an X‐ray CT scanner technique. Quantitative assessments of gas hydrate concentrations in core samples have been made based on pressure response of dissociation vessels and direct volumetric measurements. Six types of gas hydrate have been recognized: (1) pore‐space hydrate, (2) platy hydrate, (3) layered/massive hydrate, (4) disseminated hydrate, (5) nodule hydrate, and (6) vein/dyke hydrate. The X‐ray CT images proved useful for characterizing macroscopic forms of gas hydrate. Finer grained occurrences were more difficult to study, however the distribution of gas hydrates and granular grains can be recognized. The occurrences of natural gas hydrates in the Mallik well are compared to the previous natural gas hydrate core samples obtained from ODP/DSDP programs and other field studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".