MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2049050410 · doi:10.1097/fjc.0b013e31827afcee

Effect of Ischemia Reperfusion Injury and Epoxyeicosatrienoic Acids on Caveolin Expression in Mouse Myocardium

2013· article· en· W2049050410 on OpenAlexafffund
Ketul R. Chaudhary, Woo Jung Cho, Fenghua Yang, Victor Samokhvalov, Haitham El‐Sikhry, Edwin E. Daniel, John M. Seubert

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsCaveolin 1IschemiaReperfusion injuryPharmacologyMedicineChemistryCardiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Caveolins (Cav) are structural proteins that insert into the plasma membrane to form caveolae that can bind molecules important in cardiac signal transduction and function. Cytochrome P450 epoxygenases can metabolize arachidonic acid to epoxyeicosatrienoic acids (EETs) which have known cardioprotective effects. Subsequent metabolism of EETs by soluble epoxide hydrolase reduces the protective effect. AIMS: (1) To assess the effect of ischemia-reperfusion injury on expression and subcellular localization of caveolins. (2) To study the effect of EETs on caveolins. METHODS: Hearts from soluble epoxide hydrolase null (KO) and littermate control (WT) mice were perfused in Langendorff mode and subjected to 20 minutes ischemia followed by 40 minutes reperfusion. Immunohistochemistry, immunoblot, and electron microscopy were performed to study localization of caveolins and changes in ultrastructure. RESULTS: In WT heart, Cav-1 and Cav-3 were present in cardiomyocyte and capillary endothelial cell at baseline. After ischemia, Cav-1 but not Cav-3, disappeared from cardiomyocyte; moreover, caveolae were absent and mitochondrial cristae were damaged. Improved postischemic functional recovery observed in KO or WT hearts treated with 11,12-EET corresponded to higher Cav-1 expression and maintained caveolae structure. In addition, KO mice preserved the Cav-1 signaling after ischemia that lost in WT mice. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, our data suggest that ischemia-reperfusion injury causes loss of Cav-1 and caveolins, and EETs-mediated cardioprotection involves preservation of Cav-1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.790

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cardiovascular PharmacologySame topicEicosanoids and Hypertension PharmacologyFrench-language works237,207