Effect of the Combination of Human Thioredoxin and L-Cysteine on Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Isolated Rat Lungs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We studied the role of human thioredoxin and L-cysteine in ischemia-reperfusion lung injury. Thirty adult Wistar rats were allocated to five groups, according to the drug added to the pulmonary artery flush solution before ischemia (groups 1 and 2: none; group 3: human thioredoxin; group 4: L-cysteine, and group 5: human thioredoxin and L-cysteine) and according to the ex vivo ischemic interval at 37 degrees C (group 1: no ischemia; groups 2-5: 90 min). After ischemia, the lungs were reperfused for 60 min with Krebs-Henseleit solution containing 4% bovine serum albumin. In nonischemic lungs, the pulmonary arterial pressure, airway pressure, wet to dry lung weight ratio and the albumin concentration in bronchoalveolar fluid were within normal ranges. In contrast, all parameters of ischemic untreated lungs were generally poor. Compared to the ischemic untreated lungs, treatment with the combination of human thioredoxin and L-cysteine significantly reduced the wet to dry lung weight ratio (group 2: 9.18 +/- 0.25, group 5: 7.88 +/- 0.27), and the albumin concentration in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (group 2: 78.3 +/- 17.1 micrograms/ml, group 5: 24.0 +/- 3.8 micrograms/ml). No significant improvement was found in pulmonary arterial pressure and airway pressure. These results suggested that treatment with human thioredoxin (adult T cell leukemia-derived factor) and L-cysteine attenuates ischemia-reperfusion injury in isolated rat lungs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".