Chromosomal evolution in the Ehrlich-Lettré complex of hyperdiploid mouse ascites tumors: Results from seven laboratory strains
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The chromosomes of 7 strains of the hyperdiploid Ehrlich-Lettré mouse ascites tumor (ELD) were analyzed by conventional stainings and by G- and C-bandings. A tendency to slow decrease in chromosome number during a 20-year period was revealed in the 7 strains and in the ELD complex in general. A G-band idiogram of the normal mouse chromosomes was elaborated with numbering of regions and bands. By G-band analysis the following average composition of the ELD karyotypes was indicated: unchanged mouse chromosomes (30%,), marA, marB, minutes (11%), mar1—mar12, telocentric markers (10%), anonymous telocentric markers, often strongly rearranged (50%). Great differences were revealed among normal chromosomes and markers in their capacity to persist in the tumor stemline as structurally stable units. The presence of some unchanged chromosomes in most cells of all 7 strains indicated that they involved selective advantage. Evidently chromosomal evolution has operated by preferably maintaining certain elements unchanged and by submitting other elements to heavy rearrangement. The C-band analysis showed that, in addition to the centromeric C-heterochromatin present in all chromosomes, some had interstitial C-bands, as marA in all strains, mar5 and mar7 in specific single strains, and others in numbers varying among the strains.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".