Treating chronic hepatitis C with pegylated interferon alfa‐2a (40 KD) and ribavirin in clinical practice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pegylated interferon alfa-2a (40 KD) plus ribavirin therapy induces sustained virological response rates up to 63% in randomized-controlled trials. AIM: To conduct a prospective open-label programme to examine the efficacy and safety of this therapy in routine clinical practice. METHODS: Treatment-naive patients with chronic hepatitis C received, at the discretion of the investigator, pegylated interferon alfa-2a 180 microg/week + ribavirin 800 mg/day for 24 or 48 weeks. In total, 508 patients were enrolled [334 non-cirrhotic; 174 cirrhotic (defined as stage F3 and F4)]. RESULTS: In genotype 1 patients treated for 48 weeks, sustained virological response rates were 41% in non-cirrhotics and 34% in cirrhotics. Sustained virological response rates in genotype 2 or 3 non-cirrhotics were 79% (24 weeks) and 72% (48 weeks). Corresponding values for cirrhotic genotype 2/3 were 66% and 44%. The negative predictive value of an early virological response at week 12 was 94%. Predictive factors for sustained virological response on multivariate analysis were genotype (2/3 vs. 1), low viral load and degree of fibrosis. Rates of serious adverse events (<or=5%) and adverse events inducing withdrawal (
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.022 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".