Active Galactic Nuclei in the CNOC2 Field Galaxy Redshift Survey
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present a sample of 47 confirmed and 14 candidate active galactic nuclei (AGNs) discovered in the Canadian Network for Observational Cosmology field galaxy redshift survey (CNOC2). The sample consists of 38 objects identified from broad emission lines, eight from narrow [Ne V] emission, and 15 candidates from Fe II or Mg II absorption lines, one of which has been confirmed as a broad-line AGN via infrared spectroscopy. Redshifts of these AGNs range from z = 0.27 to z = 4.67, and the average absolute magnitude is M B ≃ -22.25, below the quasar/Seyfert division at M B = -23. Only two of the AGNs are detected at radio wavelengths. We find that only 0.3%±0.1% of galaxies brighter than ∼ M * + 1 at 0.281 < z < 0.685 contain broad-line or [Ne V] AGNs. We find a total surface density of 270–400 AGNs deg -2 to R = 22.09, comparable to previously published estimates. About 20% of these AGNs are classified as resolved or probably resolved in CFHT seeing and might be missed in surveys that target unresolved objects only. The sample includes several unusual objects: one with a very strong double-peaked Mg II emission line, several with unusual emission-line properties, one with an O III λ3133 broad absorption line, at least one with an optical absorption-line spectrum but broad Hα emission in the near-IR. No color selection criteria were involved in selecting this spectroscopically discovered sample. The sample is also unbiased against objects with luminous host galaxies, since the spectroscopy preferentially targeted extended objects. Simple color-color diagram selection criteria can recover ∼81% ± 6% of the CNOC2 AGNs, but several of the most unusual objects would be missing from such a color-selected sample. In the subsample of broad emission line–selected AGNs, the average equivalent widths for Mg II and C III] agree with the predictions of previous studies of the Baldwin effect. However, the average equivalent widths for C IV and Lyα are smaller than predicted by previous studies of the Baldwin effect at lower redshift. This may imply that the slopes of the C IV and Lyα Baldwin effects evolve with redshift, steepening with cosmic time. The broad emission line subsample also shows a higher incidence of associated Mg II λ2798 absorption than in most previous surveys and an incidence of associated C IV λ1549 absorption that may be more similar to that of radio-selected quasar samples than optically selected ones. This may arise from strong absorption being anticorrelated with optical luminosity or becoming less frequent with cosmic time or possibly because our selection method is not biased against objects with resolved spatial structure or reddened by dust associated with the absorbing gas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".