MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2049188949 · doi:10.1021/ja511444e

Hydrogen Peroxide Displacing DNA from Nanoceria: Mechanism and Detection of Glucose in Serum

2015· article· en· W2049188949 on OpenAlexafffund
Biwu Liu, Ziyi Sun, Po‐Jung Jimmy Huang, Juewen Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvanced Nanomaterials in Catalysis
Canadian institutionsNational Institute for Nanotechnology
FundersOntario Ministry of Research and InnovationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaResearch and Innovation FoundationUniversity of Waterloo
KeywordsChemistryHydrogen peroxideGlucose oxidaseBiosensorNanoparticleDNAPeroxidaseFluorescenceCombinatorial chemistryCatalaseBiophysicsBiochemistryNanotechnologyEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is a key molecule in biology. As a byproduct of many enzymatic reactions, H2O2 is also a popular biosensor target. Recently, interfacing H2O2 with inorganic nanoparticles has produced a number of nanozymes showing peroxidase or catalase activities. CeO2 nanoparticle (nanoceria) is a classical nanozyme. Herein, a fluorescently labeled DNA is used as a probe, and H2O2 can readily displace adsorbed DNA from nanoceria, resulting in over 20-fold fluorescence enhancement. The displacement mechanism instead of oxidative DNA cleavage is confirmed by denaturing gel electrophoresis and surface group pKa measurement. This system can sensitively detect H2O2 down to 130 nM (4.4 parts-per-billion). When coupled with glucose oxidase, glucose is detected down to 8.9 μM in buffer. Detection in serum is also achieved with results comparable with that from a commercial glucose meter. With an understanding of the ligand role of H2O2, new applications in rational materials design, sensor development, and drug delivery can be further exploited.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations423
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicAdvanced Nanomaterials in CatalysisFrench-language works237,207