MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2049259928 · doi:10.1139/o00-051

DNases and apoptosis

2000· article· en· W2049259928 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
M.F. Counis, Alicia Torriglia

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry and Cell Biology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCell death mechanisms and regulation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsApoptosisBiologyChemistryCell biologyEvolutionary biologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Here we review the different apoptotic DNases. From a functional point of view, DNases implicated in apoptosis may be classified into three groups: the Ca2+/Mg2+ endonucleases, the Mg2+-endonucleases, and the cation-independent endonucleases. The first group includes DNase I which has no specificity for the linker region, DNase gamma which has some homology with DNase I, and other DNases which cleave DNA in the linker region. Both DNase I and DNase gamma have been cloned. The other nucleases of this category have dispersed molecular weights. Their sequences are unknown and it is difficult to determine their role(s) in apoptosis. It seems that different pathways are present and that these nucleases may be activated either by caspases or serine proteases. The caspase 3 activated DNase (CAD, CPAN, or DFF40) belongs to the Mg2+-dependent endonucleases. DNase II belongs to the third group of acid endonucleases or cation-independent DNases. We have shown the involvement of DNase II in lens cell differentiation. Recently, the molecular structure of two different enzymes has been elucidated, one of which has a signal peptide and appears to be secreted. The other, called L-DNase II, is an intracellular protein having two enzymatic activities; in its native form, it is an anti-protease, and after posttranslational modification, it becomes a nuclease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.106
Threshold uncertainty score0.430

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations107
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistry and Cell BiologySame topicCell death mechanisms and regulationFrench-language works237,207