MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2049264140 · doi:10.1094/pdis.2000.84.11.1241

Molecular Characterization of Vegetative Compatibility Group 4A and 4B Isolates of <i>Verticillium dahliae</i> Associated with Potato Early Dying

2000· article· en· W2049264140 on OpenAlexaffabout
Katherine F. Dobinson, Myrtle Harrington, M. A. Omer, R. C. Rowe

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Disease · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicNematode management and characterization studies
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVerticillium dahliaeBiologyRestriction fragment length polymorphismSubspeciesVirulenceSolanaceaeLeafhopperNematodeFungi imperfectiIndustrial cropBotanyPolymerase chain reactionGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Forty isolates of Verticillium dahliae, collected from potato seed tubers and potato plants from various regions in North America and previously assigned to vegetative compatibility groups (VCGs) 4A or 4B, were characterized using molecular markers. The VCG 4A isolates were previously shown to be a highly virulent pathotype of potato and to interact synergistically with the root-lesion nematode Pratylenchus penetrans to cause potato early dying. All but one of the VCG 4A isolates characterized in this study lacked the subspecies-specific repetitive DNA sequence E18 and could be differentiated from the remaining isolates by restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) in the nuclear rDNA and Trp1 loci. The E18 RFLP patterns of several VCG 4B isolates from Maine and New York were highly similar to those of VCG 4B isolates previously collected from potato and tomato fields in Ontario. The data presented here suggest that the molecular markers will be useful for the detection and classification of isolates of V. dahliae associated with potato early dying.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.590
Threshold uncertainty score0.167

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant DiseaseSame topicNematode management and characterization studiesFrench-language works237,207