MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2049336137 · doi:10.1115/1.3082403

Heat Transfer to Supercritical Water in a Horizontal Pipe: Modeling, New Empirical Correlation, and Comparison Against Experimental Data

2009· article· en· W2049336137 on OpenAlexaff
Majid Bazargan, D. Fraser

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Heat Transfer · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat transfer and supercritical fluids
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupercritical fluidTurbulenceHeat transferForced convectionConvective heat transferHeat transfer coefficientMechanicsBuoyancyTurbulent Prandtl numberConvectionCombined forced and natural convectionThermodynamicsMaterials scienceNusselt numberNatural convectionPhysicsReynolds number

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Enhancement of heat transfer to supercritical fluids has drawn the attentions of many researchers within the past few decades. Modeling and predicting heat transfer to turbulent flow of supercritical fluids, however, are very complicated due to severe variations of fluid properties near the critical point. Large discrepancies between available heat transfer data are greatly due to confusion of forced convection and mixed convection data. The data unaffected by buoyancy have been selected cautiously from a large database generated in this study. Such data have been used to develop a 1D numerical model as well as a semi-empirical correlation to predict forced convection heat transfer to turbulent flow of supercritical water. In the numerical model, radial variations of heat flux and shear stress are taken into account. Modifications to turbulent Prandtl number and wall shear stress formulations have been applied to a law of the wall type of model to fit supercritical conditions. The model shows good agreement with experiments. In the experimental part, the extensive database obtained on a full-scale test facility in the present study, plus a new conceptual approach, has been employed together to develop a semi-empirical heat transfer correlation. It accurately predicts the experiments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Heat TransferSame topicHeat transfer and supercritical fluidsFrench-language works237,207