ALTERATIONS IN TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR BINDING AT THE IL-2 PROMOTER REGION IN ANERGIZED HUMAN CD4+ T LYMPHOCYTES
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The mechanisms responsible for the induction of clonal anergy are not well understood. We have utilized an in vitro model of human T cell anergy to explore the perturbations in cell signaling at the level of interleukin (IL)-2 gene transcription and to define the contribution of other cytokines to this effect. METHODS: An in vitro model of clonal anergy was established by using CD4+ T lymphocytes from healthy human donors. Cells were anergized by prestimulation with an anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody (mAb) followed by restimulation 72 hr later with anti-CD3 mAb with or without anti-CD28. RESULTS: CD4+ T cells, anergized with anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody (OKT3) prestimulation, displayed a marked reduction in proliferation (P=0.0036) and IL-2 production (P<0.0001). Co-incubation with IL-10 reduced cellular proliferation in OKT3/CD28 pretreated cells by 19% (P=NS) and reduced IL-2 production by 40% (P=0.0024). Anergized T cells demonstrated a reduced binding activity of the AP-1 complex to the IL-2 promoter. Supershift experiments and Western blots confirmed that the binding of c-Fos, JunB, and JunD, but not of FosB, was reduced in anergized cells. At the sis-inducible element (SIE)-binding region of the c-Fos promoter, Stat3 binding was reduced. CONCLUSIONS: T cell anergy, induced by prestimulation with OKT3, is characterized by reduced proliferation and a profound decrease in IL-2 production. Anergy can be prevented by co-incubation with anti-CD28 and partially re-established by IL-10. Anergy is accompanied by a reduction in AP-1 binding to the IL-2 promoter, with selective reduction in binding of c-Fos, JunB, and JunD. Defective binding for Stat3 at the c-Fos promoter suggests an involvement of the Jak-Stat pathway.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".