Dissecting quantitative trait loci into opposite blood pressure effects on Dahl rat chromosome 8 by congenic strains
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Our previous linkage analyses showed that there was likely a quantitative trait locus (QTL) for blood pressure (BP) on chromosome 8 (Chr 8) in the strain comparison between the Dahl salt-sensitive (S) and the Lewis (LEW) rats. The current work is to delineate the chromosome interval harboring this QTL by using congenic strains with different chromosome substitutions. METHODS: Two congenic strains were produced by replacing different segments of the S rats with the homologous segments of the LEW rats. A genome-wide marker screening was utilized to accelerate this process. The two strains generated are designated as C8S.L1 and C8S.L2, respectively. BPs of the rats were measured by telemetry. RESULTS: C8S.L1 showed a BP lower than that of S rats. In contrast, C8S.L2 did not have chromosome overlaps with C8S.L1, but unexpectedly, exhibited a BP-raising effect, higher than that of S rats. CONCLUSION: There are at least two QTLs present in a section of Chr 8 that possess opposite BP effects. The current congenic work reveals not only the presence of QTLs, but the complexity of QTLs on BP. The novel congenic strain with hypertension more severe than S provides a new model for studies in elucidating physiological mechanisms controlling BP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".