Naming and Translation/Naming in Translation: Toward a Close Reading of Don Quijote (Part I, Chapter I)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AbstractThis article examines the indeterminate nature of the different "acts of naming and non-naming" in the first chapter of Part One of Don Quijote. For example, there is much doubt surrounding Don Quijote's family name and place of origin. In other cases to be explored, the naming process is slightly more concrete, such as Don Quijote's naming after that of his horse, and the naming of the lady of his thoughts. The indeterminacy surrounding these acts is particularly interesting when examined from the perspective of the work's various translations, which each add an astonishing multiplicity of semantic possibilities. Four recent (i.e. from the last fifteen years) English translations will be studied with the objective of showing how different translators have confronted these ambiguous passages, and broaching the questions the translations themselves raise regarding these famous literary acts of naming.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it