Liposomal tacrolimus lotion as a novel topical agent for treatment of immune-mediated skin disorders: experimental studies in a murine model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Systemic but not topical tacrolimus (TAC) is effective against psoriasis. Mechanical methods that enhance skin penetration by TAC increase its topical antipsoriatic effect. Liposomal delivery of TAC would increase its penetration of skin, allow for slow release and diminish its toxicity. OBJECTIVES: To test a liposomal TAC (LTAC) formulation in a murine model. METHODS: Drug penetration was assessed using radiolabelled LTAC, and the effect of TAC and LTAC on Balb/c skin graft survival and on ovalbumin-induced delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions was tested in C57BL/6 mice. RESULTS: Radiotracer studies showed that topical application of LTAC achieved nine times the concentration of TAC at a target site than did systemic administration of TAC. Combination of systemic and topical LTAC significantly increased mean +/- SD skin graft survival (14.8 +/- 1.5 days) compared with systemic TAC (8.0 +/- 0.7 days) and control mice (8.4 +/- 1.2 days). LTAC was more effective systemically than TAC in the prevention of delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions. Topical LTAC also prevented this response. CONCLUSIONS: Topical LTAC was effective in this model of immune-mediated skin disease. Because LTAC achieves higher skin concentrations than systemic TAC it may be an effective delivery system for TAC in the treatment of psoriasis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".