MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2049394748 · doi:10.1080/07060660309507064

Relationships of<i>Pythium</i>isolates and sweet pepper plants in single-plant hydroponic units

2003· article· en· W2049394748 on OpenAlexaffvenue
N. Owen-Going, J.C. Sutton, Bernard Grodzinski

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Pathology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Pathogens and Resistance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPythium aphanidermatumBiologyInoculationHorticulturePepperZoosporeBrowningShootRoot rotPythiumMyceliumBotanySporeBiological pest control

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract An isolate of Pythium aphanidermatum and five isolates of Pythium dissotocum were examined for ability to colonize and produce symptoms in root systems of sweet pepper grown in aerated nutrient solution in single-plant hydroponic units in a research greenhouse. Repetitions of the study were conducted in April 2000, February 2001, and May 2001. Roots were inoculated by immersion for 30 min in a suspension of 5 × 103 zoospores/mL nutrient solution. All isolates rapidly colonized the root systems and increased density of cortical cells with cytoplasmic granulation in all repetitions. Symptoms produced by a given isolate differed but generally overlapped with those caused by other isolates and variously included zones of root-tip browning of different sizes and hues (all isolates), expansive browning (P. aphanidermatum) or yellowing (P. dissotocum), architectural changes (chiefly stunting, stubbiness, and proliferation of roots with all isolates), root swelling (P. dissotocum), and callus cell proliferation (P. dissotocum). Patterns of increase in incidence of brown root tips and of expansive root discoloration differed among isolates and among experimental repetitions. Circumstantial evidence suggested that higher temperature and light conditions of May 2001 promoted disease caused by P. aphanidermatum and P. dissotocum isolates compared with February 2001 and, in some instances, April 2000. Observations indicated that moderate differences in temperature, light, or other environmental variables among the repetitions markedly influenced the expression of discoloration and of other symptoms in colonized roots. All isolates reduced various growth parameters of the roots and shoots in one or more repetitions; however, relationships of colonization and symptoms to growth were generally unclear. Collectively, the data have applications for evaluating control methods in single-plant hydroponic units and contribute to an understanding of the epidemiology of root rot caused by Pythium spp. in greenhouse pepper. Keywords: Pythium aphanidermatumPythium dissotocumCapsicum annuumroot colonizationsymptomsdisease progresshydroponics

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.652
Threshold uncertainty score0.908

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.147 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant PathologySame topicPlant Pathogens and ResistanceFrench-language works237,207