Host Response to Human Acellular Dermal Matrix Transplantation in a Primate Model of Abdominal Wall Repair
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Commercially available human acellular dermal matrix (HADM), AlloDerm((R)), was implanted as an interpositional graft in the abdominal wall of adult vervet monkeys. Host response to implanted HADM was evaluated and compared with a human cellular dermal matrix (HCDM) and a primate acellular dermal matrix (PADM). Clinical acceptance of the acellular grafts (HADM and PADM) and graft remodeling were evidenced by fibroblast repopulation and neoangiogenesis. A mild inflammatory response marked predominantly by macrophages and T-cells was present in both HADM and PADM during the first month but was absent by 3 months. Similarly, antibody and complement deposition into the grafts as well as in the serum was evident only at the early time points. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) or IL-10 was induced in some acellular graft-implanted monkeys at the early time points, but tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma), or IL-2 was not detected over the study period. In contrast, significant inflammation was observed in HCDM-implanted animals, as evidenced by immune cell infiltration (p </= 0.0001), immunoglobulin G (IgG) binding (p < 0.001), complement (C5b) deposition (p < 0.05), TNF-alpha deposition (p < 0.001), and macrophage activation (p < 0.05). Abdominal wall repair in the vervet monkey is an immunologically relevant model to evaluate functional efficacy and host immune response to implanted biomaterials and may be predictive of clinical response and surgical outcomes in humans.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it