MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2049532025 · doi:10.1002/iub.244

Androgen receptor and caveolin‐1 in prostate cancer

2009· review· en· W2049532025 on OpenAlexaff
Nigel C. Bennett, John D. Hooper, Cheok Soon Lee, Glenda C. Gobé

Bibliographic record

VenueIUBMB Life · 2009
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCaveolin-1 and cellular processes
Canadian institutionsTellabs (Canada)
FundersCancer Council Queensland
KeywordsAndrogen receptorProstateCaveolin 1Prostate cancerCancerReceptorCancer researchBiologyChemistryMedicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The androgen receptor (AR) is involved in the development and maintenance of the normal prostate and the development and progression of prostate cancer (PCa). Caveolin-1 (cav-1) is an AR co-regulator. The expression of this integral membrane protein is upregulated in PCa and correlates positively with its development. This review focuses on the likely interactive roles of AR and cav-1, with particular reference to progression to androgen-insensitivity in PCa. The classical role of AR is modulation of gene transcription by binding specific DNA sequences called androgen response elements in the promoter regions of target genes. To carry out this role, AR interacts with many co-regulator proteins which either enhance or repress its activation. Altered expression or misregulated activation of a co-regulator protein may significantly alter AR activity and the basal transcription rate of androgen responsive genes. Cav-1 has roles in cell signalling and trafficking, roles that are important in PCa survival, metastasis, and the development of multidrug resistant phenotypes. Although cav-1 appears to increase AR genomic activity and increase tumor cell survival, there is also mounting evidence that cav-1 can manipulate rapid, non-genomic AR signalling at the plasma membrane. By increasing our understanding of cav-1 as an AR co-regulator, we may be able to reinstate appropriate transcriptional responses to androgen signalling and minimise misregulated AR activity, thus permitting more effective targeted therapies for PCa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIUBMB LifeSame topicCaveolin-1 and cellular processesFrench-language works237,207