MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Similarity Equations for Wind and Temperature Profiles in the Radix Layer, at the Bottom of the Convective Boundary Layer

2001· article· en· W2049571763 on OpenAlexafffund
Edi Santoso, Roland Stull

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of WyomingU.S. Department of EnergyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsDimensionless quantityConvective Boundary LayerBoundary layerMechanicsConvectionWind speedPotential temperatureSimilarity (geometry)GeologyGeometryMixed layerSimilarity solutionSurface layerPlanetary boundary layerMeteorologyLayer (electronics)PhysicsMaterials scienceMathematicsAtmospheric sciencesComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the middle of the convective boundary layer, also known as the mixed layer, is a relatively thick region where wind speed and potential temperature are nearly uniform with height.Below this uniform layer (UL), wind speed decreases to zero at the ground, and potential temperature increases to the surface skin value.This whole region below the UL is called the radix layer (RxL), and is of order hundreds of meters thick.Within the bottom of the RxL lies the classical surface layer (order of tens of meters thick) that obeys traditional Monin-Obukhov similarity theory.The RxL depth is shown to depend on friction velocity, Deardorff velocity, and boundary layer depth.The wind RxL is usually thicker than the temperature RxL.Using RxL depth, UL wind speed, and UL potential temperature as length, velocity, and temperature scales, respectively, one can form dimensionless heights, velocities, and temperatures.When observations obtained within the RxL are plotted in this dimensionless framework, the data collapse into similarity curves.This data collapse is tightly packed for data collected over singlelocation homogeneous surfaces, and shows more scatter for data collected along 72-km flight tracks over heterogeneous surfaces.Empirical profile equations are proposed to describe this RxL similarity.When these profile equations are combined with the flux equations from convective transport theory, the results are new flux-profile equations for a deep region within the bottom of the convective boundary layer.These RxL profile similarity equations are calibrated using data from four sites with different roughnesses: Minnesota, BLX96-Lamont, BLX96-Meeker, and BLX96-Winfield.The empirical parameters are found to be invariant from site to site, except for the profile shape parameter for wind speed.This parameter is found to depend on standard deviation of terrain elevation, rather than on the aerodynamic roughness length.The resulting parameter values are compared with independent data from a forested fifth site, Koorin, and it is found that displacement height must be subtracted from all the heights in the RxL profile equations.The resulting profile equations could be useful for calculating wind loading on bridges, wind turbine power estimation, air pollutant transport, or other applications where wind speeds or temperatures are needed over the bottom hundreds of meters of the convective boundary layer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Atmospheric SciencesSame topicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent FlowsFrench-language works237,207