MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2049600451 · doi:10.1159/000309367

Retinal Pigment Epithelial Fine Structure in the Nighthawk (Chordeiles minor)

2010· article· en· W2049600451 on OpenAlexaff
Charlie R. Braekevelt

Bibliographic record

VenueOphthalmologica · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRetinal Development and Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndoplasmic reticulumBruch's membraneMelanosomeCuboidal CellAnatomyCell biologyBiologyRetinalTight junctionGolgi apparatusRetinaRetinal pigment epitheliumUltrastructureChemistryEpitheliumMelaninBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) layer of a nocturnally active bird, the nighthawk (Chordeiles minor), has been investigated by electron microscopy. This layer is composed of a single layer of low cuboidal cells joined laterally by tight junctions. Basally (sclerally), the epithelial cells display deep infoldings while apically (vitreally) numerous processes enclose photoreceptor outer segments. Internally, the nucleus is large, vesicular and basally located. Smooth endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria are abundant. Rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER) is scarce but numerous polysomes are present. Myeloid bodies are widespread and often appear to be continuous with the RER membranes. Phagosomes of outer segment material are present but not numerous in the light-adapted condition. Large spindle-shaped melanosomes as well as numerous rounded tapetal spheres are present in the apical region and apical processes of the epithelial cells. The composition of the reflective tapetal spheres is unknown. Bruch's membrane (complexus basalis) in most locations displays a pentalaminate appearance while in some regions it is trilaminate. The endothelium of the choriocapillaris facing Bruch's membrane is extremely thin but only sparsely fenestrated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOphthalmologicaSame topicRetinal Development and DisordersFrench-language works237,207