MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2049610389 · doi:10.1109/ghtc.2014.6970308

Exo-supportive device for individuals with restricted mobility

2014· article· en· W2049610389 on OpenAlexaff
Dmitry Klishch, Sean Horn, Bruno Rocha

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMuscle activation and electromyography studies
Canadian institutionsAlgonquin College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceScalabilityWork (physics)Battery (electricity)GaitSimulationHuman–computer interactionPhysical medicine and rehabilitationEngineeringMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main goal of this work is to design and build an economical and efficient mobility-device that is external to the user and is able to improve motor performance by supporting task-specific movement. Increasing numbers of people of all ages are affected by injuries that result in restricted movement. These people are victims of car or other accidents, children with congenital pathologies and others suffering from traumas caused by lifting and carrying heavy loads in various work places. All these situations require a simple and cost-effective solution. There are few existing technologies that allow people to recover from or, potentially, to prevent these serious injuries. The few that do exist at a Technology Readiness Level (TRL) 7 or higher are prohibitively expensive (US$100k-150k). The developed prototype design has four main benefits when compared to similar existing devices. One is the improvement of the gait-cycle allowing the wearer to perform more natural movements. The new design also has more flexible joints to give the wearer more comfort while performing complex movements. The integrated micro-controller and sensors allow the device to operate safely without reacting to unintentional motions (coughing, sneezing and shivering). Another benefit is the scalability of the device: it is adaptable to the unique physiology of any person. The prototype currently has limited operation endurance, in the order of 30 minutes with a single battery and without recharging the energy source. Current research is aimed at designing a more effective energy system to extend operation endurance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMuscle activation and electromyography studies→French-language works237,207→