Liver repopulation and long-term function of rat small hepatocyte transplantation as an alternative cell source for hepatocyte transplantation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hepatocyte transplantation (HT) is an attractive therapeutic modality for liver disease as an alternative for liver organ transplantation. Primary fresh hepatocytes (FHs) are the exclusive cell source that has been used for clinical HT. However, the use of FHs is limited due to a shortage of donor cells. Small hepatocytes (SHs) are hepatic progenitor cells and can be isolated not only from rodents but also from humans. SHs can proliferate in vitro and express liver functions, although conventional hepatocytes lose them within a short period after culture. SH functions in vivo have never been studied. We therefore investigated HT using SHs to evaluate cell engraftment and function compared to HT using FHs. The donor cell number in the SH group was smaller than that in the FH group at HT. The cell engraftment in the SH group was smaller in the liver and larger in the spleen than in the FH group. The cell engraftment in the liver increased after HT; however, that in the spleen decreased after HT in both groups. HT using SHs supported the serum albumin level in the NAR experiment as well as that using FH, and albumin mRNA was detectable in the recipients' tissues at 12 weeks after HT. In conclusion, HT using SHs showed hepatic repopulation similar to that using FHs. This suggests that both SHs and FHs can repopulate the liver as if they were hepatic stem cells. In addition, HT using SHs supported liver functions such as albumin correction at the same level as that using FHs. These observations strongly support the idea that SHs could be an alternative to primary FHs as a novel cell source for future HT.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".