MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2049678342 · doi:10.1149/1.2982906

Hybrid Bonding (Plasma activation and Anodic bonding) for Vacuum Sealing

2008· article· en· W2049678342 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D IC and TSV technologies
Canadian institutionsOptech (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnodic bondingPlasmaMicroelectromechanical systemsAnodeMaterials scienceWire bondingComposite materialNanotechnologyChemistryLayer (electronics)Electrical engineeringElectrodePhysical chemistryEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Low temperature bonding by means of plasma activated bonding has been proposed. However there are the following problems for the mass-production of devices. 1) Voids occur due to small particles remaining at the interface, 2) Low bond strength in case of bonding in a vacuum. In this article we introduce the 'Hybrid Bonding' method, a combination of plasma activation and anodic bonding, which may overcome the problems and be suitable for mass-production of MEMS devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.413
Threshold uncertainty score0.477

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it