MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2049740158 · doi:10.1080/713697433

Marital and sexual aspects of old age

2000· article· en· W2049740158 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSexual & Relationship Therapy · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSexual function and dysfunction studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuman sexualityPsychologySexual functioningIntervention (counseling)Psychological interventionDevelopmental psychologySuccessful agingClinical psychologySexual dysfunctionGerontologyMedicineGender studiesPsychiatrySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents a review of the literature on conjugal and sexual functioning in elderly people. A synthesis of aging effects on the physiology of sexuality is first presented. The impact of aging on the appearance of sexual dysfunctions is also discussed. Psychological factors, which also play a role in the impact of aging on sexual functioning, are presented. Special attention is paid to the impact of attitudes on sexuality in the course of aging. The question concerning conjugal functioning during retirement is also presented. Different points of view and research results on conjugal satisfaction during retirement are presented. Finally, some studies on intervention methods aimed at the improvement of conjugal and sexual functioning during retirement are presented. In general, we suggest that such interventions would have an impact on the life of elderly people given that, during retirement, conjugal functioning becomes the main focus of people's life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.166
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it