Detailed analysis of substorm observations using SuperDARN, UVI, ground‐based magnetometers, and all‐sky imagers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A case study of a small‐magnitude isolated substorm is presented. The substorm was observed by a variety of instruments including the Super Dual Auroral Radar Network (SuperDARN), the Polar Ultra Violet Imager (UVI), CANOPUS magnetometers, the Alaska chain magnetometers, the Poker Flat meridian‐scanning photometer, and the Poker Flat all‐sky imager. It was determined that the initial brightening was centered over the combined fields of view of the various instruments. Temporal and spatial relationships among plasma flows, auroral luminosity, and magnetometer perturbations are investigated. It is found that the initial substorm signature was observed in the plasma flows, followed by the auroral brightening, and finally followed by the magnetometer perturbation. Enhanced plasma flows were observed in a spatially confined region near the auroral oval for a period of ∼5 minutes prior to the brightening. After the brightness peaked, the plasma flow velocity decreased back to a preenhancement level.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".