MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2049762676 · doi:10.1071/ea07243

Verification techniques for N2O emission at the paddock scale in New Zealand: FarmGas2006

2008· article· en· W2049762676 on OpenAlexaff
Mike Harvey, Elizabeth Pattey, Surinder Saggar, Tony Bromley, D. Webster. Dow, Michael Kotkamp, Ross J. Martin, Rowena Moss, Jagrati Singh

Bibliographic record

VenueAustralian Journal of Experimental Agriculture · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceTrace gasGrazingFlux (metallurgy)Environmental management systemAtmospheric sciencesRemote sensingIrrigationPhysicsMaterials scienceAgronomyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High-precision micrometeorological measurement with tunable diode laser (TDL)-based trace gas analysers provides a continuous spatially integrating and non-intrusive measurement technique that is capable of detecting and quantifying episodic N2O emission at the paddock scale. Results are presented from the FarmGas2006 measurement campaign conducted on a commercial dairy farm in North Canterbury, New Zealand, over 3 weeks in October 2006. This was the first field deployment of a TDL instrument for paddock-based N2O flux measurement in New Zealand. A goal of this campaign was assessment of a range of atmospheric N2O sensing technologies and micrometeorological approaches. In this paper the capabilities of TDL technology are compared with gas chromatography (GC) in flux-gradient measurements. Baseline emission was <100 ng N/m2.s and increased to <250 ng N/m2.s following grazing by the dairy herd. There was very good correlation between GC- and TDL-determined fluxes and also good agreement between the instruments in the mean emission in 10 days before (45–50 ng N/m2.s) and after (75–80 ng N/m2.s) paddock grazing. The flux was characterised by events of high emission lasting several hours such that half of the total N2O was emitted in ~10% of the time over the duration of the campaign. We discuss the implications of this and advantages of high-precision techniques as tools for ‘top-down’ verification and for the assessment of N2O emission mitigation options.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.145
Threshold uncertainty score0.508

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAustralian Journal of Experimental AgricultureSame topicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas DynamicsFrench-language works237,207