Isolation and characterization of a chromosomally encoded disulphide oxidoreductase from <i>Salmonella enterica</i> serovar <i>Typhimurium</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, the chromosomally encoded disulphide oxidoreductase dsbA from Salmonella typhimurium was cloned and characterized. A survey of a number of serovars of Salmonella subspecies I showed that dsbA is highly conserved in most, but not all members of this subclass of Salmonella species. Using motility, beta-galactosidase, and alkaline phosphatase assays as indirect indicators of disulphide oxidoreductase activity, we demonstrated that DsbA from S. typhimurium LT2 can only partially complement an Escherichia coli dsbA-null strain. This is surprising considering the high degree of conservation between these two DsbA proteins (87% amino acid identity). To determine the contribution of DsbA to the proper folding and assembly of proteins of S. typhimurium, deletion mutants were created in the avirulent strain LT2 and in the virulent strain SL1344. These null alleles were constructed by partial deletion of the dsbA-coding region and then insertion of an antibiotic resistance marker in the gene. Mutants no longer expressing a functional disulphide oxidoreductase exhibit pleitropic effects, including an increase in colony mucoidy, a dramatic decrease in motility, and an increased susceptibility to the cationic peptide protamine sulphate. The disruption of disulphide bond formation was also shown to specifically affect the stability of several proteins secreted into the extracellular environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".