Infrequent milk consumption plus being overweight may have great risk for asthma in girls
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Inadequate milk consumption and being overweight are each associated with asthma symptoms in children. Milk consumption has been inversely related to childhood overweight. Thus, being overweight may be a pathway or a confounder in milk-asthma relationship. A combination of both factors may be associated with greater risk of asthma than one factor alone. METHODS: This study included 246 children with allergist-diagnosed asthma and 477 nonasthmatic controls at the age of 8-10 years. Information on milk consumption during the last 12 months was obtained from questionnaires. Being overweight was defined as body mass index > or =85th percentile. Being overweight as a possible pathway or confounder was formally tested. The odds ratio (OR) for combined infrequent milk consumption and being overweight in asthmatic vs nonasthmatic children was determined in multivariate logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: There was a significant interaction between milk consumption and sex of the child in relation to asthma. Asthma was significantly associated with infrequent milk consumption in girls (crude OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.05-4.24) but not in boys. The asthma-milk relation in girls was neither mediated by being overweight (p(mediation tests) = 0.27) nor was the relationship confounded by being overweight (a 9% change in coefficient). Asthmatic girls had 3.6 times increased odds of having combination of infrequent milk consumption and being overweight than nonasthmatic girls (adjusted OR 3.64, 95% CI 1.18-11.24). Asthma was not associated with either factor or with absence of the other in girls. CONCLUSION: Infrequent milk consumption plus being overweight may have great risk for asthma in girls.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".