Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Highly Frustrated Magnetism 2003 conference took place on 26 - 30 August 2003 at the Institut Laue Langevin, Grenoble, France. This meeting was a follow-up to the HFM2000 meeting held in Waterloo, Canada, while another topical meeting took place in Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA, in 2002. The HFM2003 conference attracted participants from all over the world, with notable delegations from USA, Canada and Japan, as well as from several European countries. Both theoretical and experimental aspects of the physics of frustrated magnets were treated by the plenary and invited speakers as well as in the contributed talks and posters. This special issue of Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter provides a timely presentation of the recent progress and important topics in the field of frustrated magnetism. At the start of this issue we have included a comprehensive overview on strategies of materials synthesis by A~Harrison. Reviews on the topics treated have recently been published by two of the plenary speakers and their collaborators (Claire~Lhuillier [1, 2], A~Ramirez [3]) and the proceedings of the HFM2000 [4] remain a valuable source of reference. The organization of the conference was financed through the support of the Institut Laue Langevin (ILL), the Centre National de la R\'echerche Scientifique (CNRS), Grenoble, France, the City Council of Grenoble and the Neutron Round Table (European Union Framework Programme 5). We wish to thank all these bodies for their generous help. In addition we would also like to thank the following people who helped during both the organization and running of the conference: Laurence Tellier, Alison Mader and Serge Claisse. References [1] Lhuillier C and Misguich G 2002 High Magnetic Fields ed C Berthier, L P Levy and G Martinez (Berlin: Springer) [2] Misguich G and Lhuillier C Frustrated Spin Systems ed H T Diep (New York: World Scientific) to be published Preprint cond-mat 0310405 [3] Ramirez A P 2001 Handbook of Magnetic Materials vol 13 ed K H J Buschow (Amsterdam: Elsevier) pp 423--520 [4] Gingras M (ed) 2000 Can. J. Phys. 79 1283-1597
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.037 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".