Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Highly Frustrated Magnetism 2003 conference took place on 26 - 30 August 2003 at the Institut Laue Langevin, Grenoble, France. This meeting was a follow-up to the HFM2000 meeting held in Waterloo, Canada, while another topical meeting took place in Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA, in 2002. The HFM2003 conference attracted participants from all over the world, with notable delegations from USA, Canada and Japan, as well as from several European countries. Both theoretical and experimental aspects of the physics of frustrated magnets were treated by the plenary and invited speakers as well as in the contributed talks and posters. This special issue of Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter provides a timely presentation of the recent progress and important topics in the field of frustrated magnetism. At the start of this issue we have included a comprehensive overview on strategies of materials synthesis by A~Harrison. Reviews on the topics treated have recently been published by two of the plenary speakers and their collaborators (Claire~Lhuillier [1, 2], A~Ramirez [3]) and the proceedings of the HFM2000 [4] remain a valuable source of reference.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".