Distinctive Expression Pattern of ErbB Family Receptors Signifies an Aggressive Variant of Bladder Cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Expression of various members of the ErbB family (epidermal growth factor receptor/ErbB-1, ErbB-2, ErbB-3 and ErbB-4) is associated with disease stage and survival in patients with urothelial carcinoma. We examined the correlation of ErbB family receptor expression with the progression of urothelial carcinoma and survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A urothelial carcinoma tissue array was constructed from 248 archival paraffin blocks and quality control studies were ascertained. The tissue microarray was stained for epidermal growth factor receptor, ErbB-2, ErbB-3 and ErbB-4, and analyzed using an automated reader. Patient data included grade, stage, growth pattern, recurrence and survival. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier estimates of 5-year overall and recurrence-free survival were 58% and 27%, respectively. Patients with high grade, invasive or nonpapillary disease had a worse prognosis than patients with low grade, superficial or papillary disease (p <0.0001). High epidermal growth factor receptor or low ErbB-4 expression was associated with nonpapillary, high grade and invasive tumors as well as with significantly shorter recurrence-free and overall survival (p <0.002, 0.028 and 0.047, respectively). Levels of ErbB-2 and ErbB-3 expression were not associated with overall or recurrence-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: The expression profiles of ErbB-4 and epidermal growth factor receptor are prognostic in urothelial carcinoma. They may help in selecting patients at high risk with bladder cancer for more aggressive therapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".