The Cellient System for Cytohistology to Analyze p16 Positive Dyskeratocytes in Paraffin Sections of HPV-Positive Cervical Scrapes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Cellient™ Automated Cell Block System (Hologic) can be used to analyze cells of HPV-positive cervical scrapes staining positive with the biomarker p16. For this study fourteen cervical scrapes of Tanzanian women infected with HIV testing positive for HPV were selected. The paraffin Cellient sections were stained with the Papanicolaou method, with hematoxylin eosin (HE), and with the biomarker p16. This pilot study was limited to cases classified as atypical squamous lesion of unknown significance (ASCUS) and high-grade squamous lesion (HSIL) as diagnosed in the ThinPrep slide. The Cellient paraffin sections (cut from paraffin blocks prepared from the residual cervical sample) were classified into negative, atypical, CIN 1, CIN 2, and CIN 3. Multiple HPV genotypes were encountered in 79% of the scrapes. HPV16 was found in six scrapes and HPV52 in four. In the Papanicolaou sections, it was easy to detect dyskeratotic cells. Eleven of the 14 cases were p16 positive and five contained p16 positive dyskeratocytes. Of the 10 ASCUS scrapes, two contained p16 positive CIN 1 epithelial fragments. All four HSIL cases contained p16 positive CIN 3epithelial fragments. In HIV-positive HPV-positive women, the Cellient system resulted in high quality histology sections with perfect p16 images of dyskeratocytes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".