Anterior segment optical coherence tomography–aided diagnosis and primary posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation with fibrin glue in traumatic phacocele with scleral perforation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We describe the case of a middle-aged woman who presented to us after injury from a clenched fist 3 days previously. The diagnosis was occult scleral perforation, severe conjunctival chemosis, and traumatic aphakia. However, the lens could not be localized during posterior segment examination. An anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) examination showed scleral discontinuity and a heterogeneous reflection in the subconjunctival area, suggesting a possible phacocele. Surgical exploration confirmed these findings. Aphakia was managed using the "glued intraocular lens" technique in the same sitting. This case highlights the use of AS-OCT in noncontact exploration of the traumatized anterior segment and in diagnosis of a possible phacocele along with an occult scleral perforation with uveal prolapse. To our knowledge, this is the first report of successful implantation of a glued IOL as a primary procedure combined with scleral perforation repair.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".