Risk behaviour change and HIV infection among injection drug users in Montreal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the independent association between changes in risk behaviour and HIV seroconversion risk among Montreal injection drug users (IDU). DESIGN: A longitudinal study of risk behaviour change and the maintenance of low-risk practices. At baseline and semi-annually, subjects were tested for HIV, and questionnaires on risk behaviour were completed. RESULTS: A total of 833 IDU were recruited from January 1992 to June 1998, and completed a minimum of three visits. Large fluctuations in risk behaviour were observed, and the risk of HIV infection appeared to be dependent upon the consistency of risk behaviour practised. IDU who consistently engaged in risky behaviour were at high risk of HIV infection. IDU who attempted to practise low-risk behaviour but experienced relapses to risky behaviour were also at considerable risk of infection. IDU who managed to maintain low-risk practices were at minimal risk. Using Cox regression analysis, the hazard ratio (HR) of HIV seroconversion among IDU who consistently and inconsistently shared needles with an HIV-positive partner was 8.17 (95% CI 3.59-18.59) and 2.63 (95% CI 1.33-5.17), respectively, relative to non-needle sharers. Corresponding HIV incidence rates were 30.42 per 100 person-years (py) among consistent sharers, 13.78 per 100 py among inconsistent sharers and 2.51 per 100 py among non-sharers. CONCLUSION: Although some HIV risk reduction was evident, behaviour change seems to be effective only in IDU who adopt and maintain low-risk practices. Additional strategies may be needed to assist IDU in the maintenance of low-risk practices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".