Abstract P4-03-08: Pathological analysis of intraductal papillary lesions in 3690 patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background:Papillary lesions of the breast (PL) account for 1 - 2% in breast tumors and 10% in benign tumors. Ductoscopy due to its high rate (60 times) amplification and visualization of lesions, which makes it possible to directly visualize the duct from the orifice of the duct well into the periphery. It could not only find abnormities which other tests could not provide, but also predict histological diagnosis.However, ductoscopy findings and pathological results are not always consistent. Ductoscopy examine is limited by many factors such as complicated anatomical structure of breast and ductal obstruction, so in some cases it may have missed diagnosis. Lesions could be missed due to extrusion and shedding during ductoscopy examine procedure and preparation of pathological section. Methods:In this study, we retrospectively studied on 4170 papillary lesions diagnosed by ductoscopy in 3690 patients from April 23, 2008 to October 31st, 2012 and compared incidence of each disease. These cases were evaluated by final histopathology(42.2% solitary papillary lesion, 32.5% multiple papillomatosis, 13.0% premalignant or malignant lesions, 6.5% mammary duct or plasma cell mastitis, 5.7% epithelial hyperplasia). The sensitivity of ductoscopy for PL in this study was 87.8%, and specificity was 89.2%. Results and Discussion:Spontaneous nipple discharge(SND) is the third third most common presenting symptom of breast disease accounting for 3∼8% of breast symptoms. But in our experience, not all of the intraductal lesions would have SND, especially in those cases which localized more distally. Besides, intraductal lesions in premalignant or malignant lesions cases would have more incidence to localize distally than their benign papilloma. Thus, if we only take ductoscopy on patients who suffer SND, we might have some missed diagnosis for those people who did not suffer SND including malignant lesions.At present, although ductoscopy is not routine examination for breast cancer screening, we consider that for people who share a high-risk of developping breast cancer, although she might not have SND, ductoscopy could be a selective screen tool. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P4-03-08.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".