La satisfaction des patients et de leur famille vis-à-vis de l’information relative au cancer : une recension des écrits
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les individus et les familles qui font face à l’expérience du cancer ont des besoins d’apprentissage à la fois nombreux et variés. L’enseignement relatif au cancer constitue un aspect important de leurs soins. Pourtant, au cours des trois dernières décennies, il est régulièrement question, dans la littérature, de l’insatisfaction d’un grand nombre de patients et de proches vis-à-vis de l’enseignement qui leur est fourni dans ce domaine. Cet article examine les écrits relatifs à un aspect de la satisfaction vis-à-vis de l’enseignement lié au cancer et à la satisfaction des patients et des proches vis-à-vis de l’information liée au cancer, et ce, en fonction de facteurs liés aux patients, aux prestataires et à l’information. Les lacunes au niveau des recherches sont dégagées et discutées dans le cadre des recommandations pour de futurs travaux de recherche. Cet article se termine par des applications à la pratique clinique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".