Alkoxy radicals in the gaseous phase: β-scission reactions and formation by radical addition to carbonyl compounds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The structures and reactivities of the alkoxy radicals methoxy (CH 3 O·), ethoxy (CH 3 CH 2 O·), 1-propoxy (CH 3 CH 2 CH 2 O·), 2-propoxy ((CH 3 ) 2 CHO·), 2-butoxy (CH 3 CH 2 CH(CH 3 )O·), tert-butoxy ((CH 3 ) 3 CO·), prop-2-enoxy (CH 2 =CHCH 2 O·), and but-3-en-2-oxy (CH 2 =CHCH(CH 3 )O·) have been investigated at the B3-LYP/6-31G(d) and CBS-RAD levels of theory. Enthalpies of formation (Δ f H° 298 ) were calculated with CBS-RAD for all the alkoxy radicals, the carbonyl and radical products of β-scission reactions, and the transition structures leading to them. The mean absolute deviation between the predicted and available experimental Δ f H° 298 values is 5.4 kJ mol 1 . Eyring (ΔH 0 , ΔH 298 , ΔG 298 ) and Arrhenius (log A, E a ) activation parameters for both the forward (β-scission) and reverse (radical addition to carbonyl) pathways were calculated. Agreement with available experimental data is very good, generally within 15 kJ mol 1 for E a , and 0.5 for log A. The transition structures are found to be substantially polarized, with the departing radical slightly positive, the O atom negative, and the rest of the molecule positive. The barriers for the β-scission reactions decrease with decreasing endothermicity and with decreasing ionization energy of the departing radical.Key words: alkoxy, alkoxyl, radical, addition, carbonyl, β-scission, calculaton, electronic structure, B3LYP, CBS-RAD, thermochemistry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".