Antigen-Induced Mucosal Damage and Restitution in the Small Intestine of the Immunized Rat
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Intestinal mucosal damage and restitution were examined following antigen-induced systemic anaphylaxis in Nippostrongylus brasiliensis immunized rats. The rats were injected intravenously with N. brasiliensis antigen or saline. At 60 min, morphological and biochemical parameters were determined in jejunum and ileum, and the epithelial permeability was assessed by measuring recovery of 51Cr-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid in the blood after injecting it into a ligated segment. Antigen challenge resulted in significant abnormalities: (1) villus damage with sloughing of enterocytes; (2) decreased activities of brush border enzymes; (3) decreased levels of mucosal histamine and rat mast cell protease II (mast cell mediators), and (4) increased uptake of 51Cr-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid. Progression of the injury was examined by taking consecutive biopsies at 15-min intervals for 60 min and then at 5 h. At 15 min, an abnormality was present in all sections which ranged from minor oedema and enterocyte detachment at villus tips to virtual complete destruction of the apical region. Restitution occurred by villus contraction with migration of the epithelium over the damaged regions. At 5 h, the epithelium had resealed, but the villi were significantly reduced in height.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".