MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050076806 · doi:10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.11.2231

Alleles of the Estrogen Receptor α-Gene and an Estrogen Receptor Cotranscriptional Activator Gene, Amplified in Breast Cancer-1 (<i>AIB1</i>), Are Associated with Quantitative Calcaneal Ultrasound

2000· article· en· W2050076806 on OpenAlexafffund
Millan S. Patel, David E.C. Cole, Janice D. Smith, Gillian Hawker, Betty Wong, Hoang Trang, Reinhold Vieth, Paul S. Meltzer, Laurence A. Rubin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Bone and Mineral Research · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBreast Cancer Treatment Studies
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalWomen's College HospitalUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science CentreHospital for Sick Children
FundersMedical Research Council CanadaHospital for Sick ChildrenDairy Farmers of Canada
KeywordsEstrogen receptorBreast cancerMedicineEstrogenEstrogen receptor alphaActivator (genetics)AlleleCancer researchGeneCancerReceptorEndocrinologyInternal medicineBiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quantitative bone ultrasound (QUS) has a significant heritable component. Because estrogen is required for attainment of peak bone mass, we studied alleles of two genes, estrogen receptor alpha (ER1) and amplified in breast cancer-1 (AIB1), for their association with QUS. In a volunteer sample of 663 white women aged 18-35 years, bone ultrasound attenuation (BUA), speed of sound (SOS), and heel stiffness index (SI), the latter consisting of the component measures of BUA and SOS, were measured at the right calcaneus by QUS. Subjects were genotyped for the ER1 polymorphisms Xba I and Pvu II and for the AIB1 polyglutamine tract polymorphism. In a multiple regression analysis, ER1 genotype was an independent predictor of QUS-SI (p = 0.03). Because AIB1 and ER1 enhance gene expression in a coordinate manner, we also searched for interactions. A gene-by-gene interaction effect was seen for QUS-SI (p = 0.009), QUS-BUA (p = 0.03), and QUS-SOS (p = 0.004). These remained significant after the inclusion of clinically relevant variables into the final regression model. Overall, these clinical and genetic factors accounted for up to 16% of the variance in peak QUS; the genetic markers alone accounted for 4-7%. This is the first demonstration of specific genetic effects on calcaneal QUS encoded by alleles of genes directly involved in mediating estrogen effects on bone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.684
Threshold uncertainty score0.412

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Bone and Mineral ResearchSame topicBreast Cancer Treatment StudiesFrench-language works237,207