MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050089427 · doi:10.1142/s0218001403002423

A FAST SVM TRAINING ALGORITHM

2003· article· en· W2050089427 on OpenAlexafffund
Jianxiong Dong, Ching Y. Suen, Adam Krzyżak

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFace and Expression Recognition
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaChinese Academy of SciencesRoyal Society of Canada
KeywordsMNIST databaseSupport vector machineComputer scienceKernel (algebra)ScalabilityArtificial intelligenceAlgorithmMachine learningGeneralizationRadial basis function kernelTest setKey (lock)Pattern recognition (psychology)Principal component analysisKernel methodDeep learningMathematicsDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A fast support vector machine (SVM) training algorithm is proposed under SVM's decomposition framework by effectively integrating kernel caching, digest and shrinking policies and stopping conditions. Kernel caching plays a key role in reducing the number of kernel evaluations by maximal reusage of cached kernel elements. Extensive experiments have been conducted on a large handwritten digit database MNIST to show that the proposed algorithm is much faster than Keerthi et al.'s improved SMO, about nine times. Combined with principal component analysis, the total training for ten one-against-the-rest classifiers on MNIST took less than an hour. Moreover, the proposed fast algorithm speeds up SVM training without sacrificing the generalization performance. The 0.6% error rate on MNIST test set has been achieved. The promising scalability of the proposed scheme paves a new way to solve more large-scale learning problems in other domains such as data mining.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.107
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial IntelligenceSame topicFace and Expression RecognitionFrench-language works237,207