Synthesis and functional integration of a neurotransmitter receptor in isolated invertebrate axons
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Neurotransmitter receptors are considered an important class of membrane proteins that are involved in plasticity-induced changes underlying learning and memory. Recent studies, which demonstrated that the mRNAs encoding for various receptor proteins are localized to specific dendritic domains, allude toward the possibility that these membrane bound molecules may be synthesized locally. However, direct evidence for the local axonal or dendritic synthesis and functional integration of receptor proteins in either vertebrates or invertebrates is still lacking. In this study, using an invertebrate model system we provide the first direct evidence that isolated axons (in the absence of the soma) can intrinsically synthesize and functionally integrate a membrane-bound receptor protein from an axonally injected mRNA. Surgically isolated axons from identified neurons were injected with mRNA encoding a G-protein-coupled conopressin receptor. Immunocytochemical and electrophysiological techniques were used to demonstrate functional integration of the receptor protein into the membrane of the isolated axon. Ultrastructural analysis of axonal compartments revealed polyribosomes, suggesting that some components of the protein synthesizing machinery are indeed present in these extrasomal compartments. Such axonal propensity to locally synthesize and functionally insert transmitter receptors may be instrumental in plasticity induced changes, for instance those that underlie learning and memory.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".