MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Defects in electron irradiated boron-doped diamonds investigated by positron annihilation and optical absorption

2008· article· en· W2050117212 on OpenAlex
S. Dannefaer, Konstantin Iakoubovskii

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Condensed Matter · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMuon and positron interactions and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Winnipeg
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnnealing (glass)BoronMaterials scienceIrradiationAnnihilationDopingAbsorption edgePositronBand gapAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Atomic physicsElectron beam processingElectronMolecular physicsChemistryNuclear physicsOptoelectronicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Synthetic boron-doped single-crystal diamonds were irradiated by a pulsed electron beam at 2.2 MeV to various accumulated fluences from 0.7 × 10(18) to 10 × 10(18) e(-) cm(-2). The samples were then subjected to isochronal annealing up to 1260 °C and characterized by positron annihilation (PA) and optical absorption (OA) spectroscopies after each annealing step. PA combined with in situ monochromatic illumination gave an estimate for the positive/neutral energy level in the band gap for the monovacancy as ∼0.6 eV above the valence band-edge. From the analysis of PA and OA results, a dominant OA line at 0.552 eV was associated with a neutral boron-interstitial complex, and the annealing temperature of the positive monovacancy was deduced as ∼700 °C.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.498
Threshold uncertainty score0.402

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it