MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050137519 · doi:10.1515/bc.2001.019

Ligand-Mediated Regulation of Kinin Receptors in the Rabbit

2001· article· en· W2050137519 on OpenAlexaff
François Marceau, Albert Adam, Steeve Houle, Johanne Bouthillier, Magdalena Bachvarova, Dimcho Bachvarov

Bibliographic record

VenueBiological Chemistry · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCoagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema
Canadian institutionsHôtel-Dieu de QuébecCentre hospitalier universitaire de Québec
FundersPurdue University
KeywordsKininReceptorAgonistBradykininDownregulation and upregulationCell biologyChemistryBradykinin receptorG protein-coupled receptorEndocytosisLipopolysaccharideStimulationMolecular biologyBiologyEndocrinologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The kinin B1 receptors (B1Rs), stimulated by des-Arg9-kinins, are completely inducible, notably following treatment of animals with bacterial lipopolysaccharide. Several studies based on cultured cells have suggested a form of autoregulation of kinin receptors, because B2 receptor (B2R) or B1R stimulation could transcriptionally upregulate B1R expression. The B2R may rather be downregulated in inflammatory conditions. A rabbit B2R-green fluorescent protein (GFP) conjugate stably expressed in HEK 293 cells was rapidly internalized in response to the agonist bradykinin. Ligand-induced receptor cycling was documented applying confocal microscopy. The results confirm agonist-induced B2R endocytosis, but extensive recycling to the cell membrane does not support agonist-induced downregulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiological ChemistrySame topicCoagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and AngioedemaFrench-language works237,207