Cerebellar Atrophy in Childhood Arterial Ischemic Stroke
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Crossed cerebellar atrophy is uncommon in childhood arterial ischemic stroke. Acute corticospinal tract diffusion-weighted imaging (CST-DWI) changes occur in stroke of all ages. Contralateral CST-DWI is unexplained but approximates corticopontocerebellar pathways. We hypothesized that cerebellar atrophy can be quantified on clinical neuroimaging in childhood arterial ischemic stroke and is predicted by contralesional CST-DWI. METHODS: Consecutive children (>28 days-18 years) were included with the following features: (1) acute, unilateral, middle cerebral artery arterial ischemic stroke, (2) DWI <14 days from stroke onset, (3) anatomic T1 MRI >6 months, and (4) Pediatric Stroke Outcome Measure >12 months. Blinded scorers measured cerebellar volumes (left/right/hemisphere/vermis/total) using Osirix software. Cerebellar volumes ratios (nonstroke/stroke) were expressed as asymmetry indices (AI), with chronic/acute ratio <1.0 suggesting crossed atrophy. Acute brain stem and cerebellum (peduncle, hemisphere) DWI ratios were scored. Software measures were compared with visual inspection. Associations between AI, motor outcome (good/poor), and contralesional CST-DWI were sought. Rater reliabilities were assessed. RESULTS: Twenty-three children were studied (median age, 6.3±4.4 years; 62% male). Baseline cerebellar volumes were comparable (right=56.9 cm(3), left=57.1 cm(3)). Cerebellar atrophy was suggested across the sample with overall AI <1.0 (0.973±0.05; P=0.009). Visual atrophy detection was specific (≈100%) but insensitive (54%). Children with poor motor outcome did not have lower AI (0.983±0.027 versus 0.965±0.068; P=0.40); however, children with acute contralesional CST-DWI did (0.928±0.078 versus 986±0.040; P=0.03). Acute cerebellar DWI did not predict atrophy. Rater reliabilities were excellent (>0.92). CONCLUSIONS: Cerebellar atrophy can be demonstrated on MRI in childhood arterial ischemic stroke. Association with acute contralesional pontine DWI signal suggests early degeneration of corticopontocerebellar connections. The clinical significance of cerebellar atrophy in childhood stroke remains to be determined.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".