Heterogeneity in the response of vascular smooth muscle to heparin: altered signaling in heparin-resistant cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Vascular smooth muscle cells show phenotypic heterogeneity in vivo that affects the extent to which they respond to the antimitogenic effects of heparin. In vitro, heparin-resistant cells are readily selected. This study was undertaken to determine whether differences in the antiproliferative response to heparin involve differences in activity of heparin-sensitive signal transduction pathways. METHODS: Rat thoracic aorta smooth muscle cells (ASMC) at early passage together with two established vascular smooth muscle lines, PAC-1 and A10, were examined before and after selection for growth in the presence of heparin (10 micrograms/ml). Cells were rendered quiescent and then stimulated with serum. RESULTS: The three cell types showed different sensitivities to the antimitogenic effects of heparin. With respect to [3H]thymidine incorporation, A10 cells were insensitive to 1 microgram/ml heparin whereas PAC-1 cells responded down to 0.05 microgram/ml and ASMC were of intermediate sensitivity. ASMC and PAC-1 cells but not A10 showed a decrease in c-fos mRNA in response to 1 microgram/ml heparin, and a decrease in the c-Fos content of AP-1 DNA binding activity. None of the cells had decreased c-jun mRNA in the presence of heparin. Although induction of c-fos by serum is thought to signal through the Erk mitogen activated protein kinase family, Erk activity was decreased more by 1 microgram/ml heparin in A10 cells than in PAC-1 or ASMC. When cells were selected by growth in the presence of 10 micrograms/ml heparin, A10 cells were unaffected but PAC-1 and ASMC showed a blunted effect of heparin on serum stimulation. In contrast to A10 and their controls not exposed to continuous heparin, heparin-selected PAC-1 and ASMC showed a diminished ability to induce c-fos in response to serum. CONCLUSIONS: Smooth muscle cell lines show different responses to the antimitogenic effects of heparin that correlate with the heparin sensitivity of c-Fos/c-Jun expression. Although Erk is implicated in c-fos induction, cells comparatively resistant to heparin still show heparin-dependent inhibition of Erk activation, suggesting that other pathways may be more important for heparin resistance. Furthermore, cells selected for heparin resistance may develop c-fos-independent pathways for proliferation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".