Transmembrane IV of the high-affinity sodium-glucose cotransporter participates in sugar binding
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Investigation of the structure/function relationships of the sodium-glucose transporter (SGLT1) is crucial to understanding the cotransporter mechanism. In the present study, we used cysteine-scanning mutagenesis and chemical modification by methanethiosulfonate (MTS) derivatives to test whether predicted transmembrane IV participates in sugar binding. Five charged and polar residues (K139, Q142, T156, K157, and D161) and two glucose/galactose malabsorption missense mutations (I147 and S159) were replaced with cysteine. Mutants I147C, T156C, and K157C exhibited sufficient expression to be studied in detail using the two-electrode voltage-clamp method in Xenopus laevis oocytes and COS-7 cells. I147C was similar in function to wild-type and was not studied further. Mutation of lysine-157 to cysteine (K157C) causes loss of phloridzin and alpha-methyl-D-glucopyranoside (alphaMG) binding. These functions are restored by chemical modification with positively charged (2-aminoethyl) methanethiosulfonate hydrobromide (MTSEA). Mutation of threonine-156 to cysteine (T156C) reduces the affinity of alphaMG and phloridzin for T156C by approximately 5-fold and approximately 20-fold, respectively. In addition, phloridzin protects cysteine-156 in T156C from alkylation by MTSEA. Therefore, the presence of a positive charge or a polar residue at 157 and 156, respectively, affects sugar binding and sugar-induced Na(+) currents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".